These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664399)

  • 21. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience.
    Morris GH
    South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient.
    Wold SM
    Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Civil rights and the mentally ill: revolution in bedlam.
    Offir CW
    Psychol Today; 1974 Oct; 8(5):60-62+. PubMed ID: 11664431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Senate Bill 26--mental patients' bill of rights.
    Lynch FE; Neustrom PW
    Washburn Law J; 1976; 16(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 11664695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Release from involuntary custodial confinement.
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1975 Dec; 66(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 11664538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment?
    Howard SW
    Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
    Mancilla J
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
    National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Attitudes of clinical psychologists toward involuntary civil commitment law.
    Kahle LR; Sales BD
    Prof Psychol; 1978 Aug; 9(3):428-39. PubMed ID: 11662546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Post-Parham remedies: the involuntary commitment of minors in Virginia after Parham v. J.R.
    Spaulding WJ
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1979; 13(4):695-741. PubMed ID: 11665159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy.
    Flaschner FN
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views.
    Hafemeister TL; Petrila J
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
    Barnett CF
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The standard of proof necessary in involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Coleman SS
    S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(2):379-91. PubMed ID: 11665199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.