These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664399)
41. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill. Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill. Lundeen PA Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Lessard v. Schmidt and its implications for involuntary civil commitment in Wisconsin. Remington MJ Marquette Law Rev; 1973; 57(1):65-101. PubMed ID: 11664296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment. Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Balancing the interests: the move towards less restrictive commitment of New York's mentally ill. Cameron JD N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1988; 14(1):91-106. PubMed ID: 11659083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Mental health law bibliography. Wade MD Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1974; 6(1):314-40. PubMed ID: 11661142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Compulsory hospitalization and human rights. Separovic ZP Am J Soc Psychiatry; 1982; 2(4):49-52. PubMed ID: 11658693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The rights of mental patients. Ellis JW Ment Hyg; 1975; 59(3):35. PubMed ID: 11664515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment? Vermillion LJ ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release. Burnstin SM Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Involuntary civil commitment of mental patients in Israel and the protection of civil rights. Bazak J Int J Med Law; 1979; 1(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 11662750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Arkansas involuntary civil commitment: in the rear guard of the due process revolution. Knight DA Ark Law Rev; 1978; 32(2):294-346. PubMed ID: 11664973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. The rights of mental health detainees. Robinson DA; Motz BM Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):10-5. PubMed ID: 11653529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. o'Connor v. Donaldson: involuntary civil commitment and the right to treatment. Baldwin D Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1975 Fall-1976 Winter; 7(2):573-89. PubMed ID: 11664644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Judicially-ordered involuntary treatment of the mentally ill. Sullivan JL J Mo Bar; 1975 Jun; 31():254-8. PubMed ID: 11664534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Of mad dogs and scientists: the perils of the "criminal-insane". Burt RA Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Dec; 123(2):258-96. PubMed ID: 11664340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]