These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664406)
1. The patient-physician relationship: present law and trends for the future implied in Cobbs v. Grant. Kenna TW Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):320-42. PubMed ID: 11664406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices. Schneyer TJ Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Law, medicine, and trust. Hall MA J Nurs Law; 2003 May; 9(1):33-84. PubMed ID: 15282896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Contract law as a viable alternative to problems of informed consent. Norton ML Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 11664527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sard v. Hardy. 23 Mar 1977. Maryland. Court of Special Appeals Atl Report; 1977; 367():525-48. PubMed ID: 11646067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From informed consent to a duty to convince: Truman v. Thomas. Beller RL Houst Law Rev; 1981 May; 18(4):917-30. PubMed ID: 11649420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The myth about informed consent. Goldsmith LS J Leg Med (N Y); 1975 Sep; 3(8):17-20. PubMed ID: 1080502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas. Dalrymple G St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent: looking for the action. Riskin LL Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent and the patient's right to "no": Cobbs v. Grant. Novack BB Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 6(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 11660977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient advocates or patient adversaries? Using fiduciary law to compel disclosure of managed care financial incentives. Johnston K San Diego Law Rev; 1998; 35(4):951-92. PubMed ID: 12778919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical data privacy: automated interference with contractual relations. Fargo JJ Buffalo Law Rev; 1976; 25(2):491-517. PubMed ID: 11661294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent and medical malpractice: where do we go from here? Scaletta DI Manit Law J; 1980; 10(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 11665138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent ten years later: the impact of Reibl v. Hughes. Robertson G Can Bar Rev; 1991 Sep; 70(3):423-47. PubMed ID: 12211262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]