277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664423)
21. Informed consent in medical practice.
Zaslow J
Pract Lawyer; 1976 Apr; 22(3):13-26. PubMed ID: 11664636
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The decline of "informed consent".
Plant ML
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. "Informed consent" to medical treatment: the Oregon standard of disclosure.
Rollema MT
Oregon Law Rev; 1978; 57(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 11664993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas.
Dalrymple G
St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The doctrine of informed consent.
Stewart T
Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent.
Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent and the danger of bias in the formation of medical disclosure practices.
Schneyer TJ
Wis L Rev; 1976; 1976(1):124-70. PubMed ID: 11664629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. New trends in informed consent?
Jaeckel LB
Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. After Canterbury: the need for medical experts in the informed consent suit.
Isele WP
J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 May; 4(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 1084386
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects.
Alsobrook HB
Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976.
Curtis JV
KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures.
Skegg PD
Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Consent to medical treatment.
Sharpe GS
Chittys Law J; 1974 Nov; 22(9):319-23. PubMed ID: 11664555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The conscious law.
Goolsby AC
State Health Legis Rep; 1983 Feb; 11(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11658379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent in Canada: an empirical study. Part Two.
Robertson G
Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can; 1985 Mar; 18(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11658805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Recent uses and misuses of the informed consent doctrine.
Gough WV
Forum; 1974; 10(1):383-90. PubMed ID: 11661158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent before abortion requires special risk information.
Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 1-14; 18(3):39. PubMed ID: 11653476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent: looking for the action.
Riskin LL
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Walker v. North Dakota Eye Clinic, Ltd. 12 Jul 1976.
U.S. District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division
Fed Suppl; 1976; 415():891-5. PubMed ID: 11646065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Bly v. Rhoads. 5 Mar 1976.
Virginia. Supreme Court
South East Report Second Ser; 1976; 222():783-9. PubMed ID: 12038377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
