These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664429)
1. A doctor's duty to inform--Holland v. Sisters of Saint Joseph of Peace. Heilbrun RO Utah Law Rev; 1974; 1974(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 11664429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony. Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The doctor's duty of disclosure. Orwoll G Anesth Analg; 1974; 53(5):759-63. PubMed ID: 4472356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent. Halligan PD LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed. Kessenick LW; Mankin PA Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent. Penhallegon JR Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent uses and misuses of the informed consent doctrine. Gough WV Forum; 1974; 10(1):383-90. PubMed ID: 11661158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Informed consent" to medical treatment: the Oregon standard of disclosure. Rollema MT Oregon Law Rev; 1978; 57(2):322-33. PubMed ID: 11664993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent liability. Recher BC Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976. Curtis JV KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent before abortion requires special risk information. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 1-14; 18(3):39. PubMed ID: 11653476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent: looking for the action. Riskin LL Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act. Rosen MW Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment. Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]