These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. The impact of the Texas Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act on informed consent recovery in medical malpractice litigation. Elliott FW Tex Tech Law Rev; 1979; 10(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 11665221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Informed consent and the patient's right to "no": Cobbs v. Grant. Novack BB Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1973 Jul; 6(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 11660977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Informed consent: a new standard for Texas. Dalrymple G St Marys Law J; 1976; 8(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 11664790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Contract law as a viable alternative to problems of informed consent. Norton ML Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 11664527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Consent to elective surgery valid even if doctor didn't warn of known risks. Hodge RL Mercer Law Rev; 1976; 28(1):377-81. PubMed ID: 11664784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Consent to medical treatment. Sharpe GS Chittys Law J; 1974 Nov; 22(9):319-23. PubMed ID: 11664555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Informed consent: still a doctor's dilemma. Brown EN Can Med Assoc J; 1980 Oct; 123(8):811-2. PubMed ID: 7448684 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Malpractice and informed consent--a legal ploy. DeLee ST Int Surg; 1976; 61(6-7):331-2. PubMed ID: 11664601 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Practice and malpractice (one doctor's viewpoint). Demy NG Med Trial Tech Q; 1972; 19(1):61-71. PubMed ID: 5069426 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Medical treatment and human experimentation: introducing illegality, fraud, duress and incapacity to the doctrine of informed consent. Rutgers Camden Law J; 1975; 6(3):538-64. PubMed ID: 11664504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Positively truthful: appeal asks whether doctors have duty to disclose HIV status to patients. Baker D ABA J; 1998 Aug; 84():38-40. PubMed ID: 11660521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]