401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664439)
1. Ethical issues in fetal research.
Prescott JW
Humanist; 1975; 35(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11664439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Semantic problems of fetal resarch.
Pilon JG
Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 11663655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fetus as guinea pig.
Scarf M
N Y Times Mag; 1975 p 13+; 19 Oct 1975():. PubMed ID: 11664465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
Reback GL
Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
Witherspoon JP
St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
Rhoden NK
Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal research II: the ethical questions.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):118-28. PubMed ID: 11663565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Court and the Commission.
Menzel P
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 11643288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Can Congress create people?
Buckley WF; Galebach SH; Bork R; Pilpel H
Hum Life Rev; 1981; 7(3):87-108. PubMed ID: 11655601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments.
Rice CE
Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
Wilson JP
Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine.
Hicks SC
Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
Caron WR
Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Brain birth: a proposal for defining when a fetus is entitled to human life status.
Gertler GB
South Calif Law Rev; 1986 Jul; 59(5):1061-78. PubMed ID: 11655850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The decline of personhood.
Wauck J
Hum Life Rev; 1988; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
Meechan CM
Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The federal fetal experimentation regulations: an establishment clause analysis.
Friedman JM
Minn Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 61(6):961-1005. PubMed ID: 11664831
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
