These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

412 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664465)

  • 1. The fetus as guinea pig.
    Scarf M
    N Y Times Mag; 1975 p 13+; 19 Oct 1975():. PubMed ID: 11664465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Federal regulation of fetal research: toward a public policy founded onethical reasoning.
    Markey K
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1977; 31(3):675-96. PubMed ID: 11664834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal experimentation and federal regulation.
    Horan DJ
    Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):325-56. PubMed ID: 11664796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal experimentation: rights of the father and questions of personhood.
    Wilson JP
    Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):403-17. PubMed ID: 11664801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fetal research: Commission sets guidelines for experimentation.
    Leeper EM
    Bioscience; 1975 Jun; 25(6):357-360+. PubMed ID: 11664455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fetal experimentation: protocols, propriety and parameters.
    Meechan CM
    Queens Law J; 1985; 11(1):166-97. PubMed ID: 11659023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ethical issues in fetal research.
    Prescott JW
    Humanist; 1975; 35(3):37-8. PubMed ID: 11664439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum.
    Wilson JP
    Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal research and public policy.
    McCormick RA; Walters L
    America (NY); 1975 Jun; 132(24):473-6. PubMed ID: 11664448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An ethical evaluation of federal norms for fetal experimentation.
    O'Rourke KD
    Linacre Q; 1976 Feb; 43(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11663671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On human experimentation.
    DeMarco D
    Hum Life Rev; 1983; 9(4):48-60. PubMed ID: 11655592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semantic problems of fetal resarch.
    Pilon JG
    Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):89-95. PubMed ID: 11663655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
    Reback GL
    Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal research II: the ethical questions.
    Brown HO
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):118-28. PubMed ID: 11663565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restricting fetal research: the chilling effect on medical progress.
    Abzug B
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Apr; 120(56):H3171-4. PubMed ID: 11664393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal politics: the debate on experimenting with the unborn.
    Gaylin W; Lappé M
    Atl Mon (1971); 1975 May; 235(5):66-71. PubMed ID: 11663535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The still forbidden fruit.
    Meilaender G
    Christ Today; 1977 Jan; 21(8):16-9. PubMed ID: 11661449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A bias for life: abortion does not justify harmful research.
    Siegel S
    Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):109-17. PubMed ID: 11663564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Haunting shadows from the rubble of Roe's right of privacy.
    Haley JN
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1974; 9(1):145-84. PubMed ID: 11664401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the moderate consensus.
    Toulmin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):31-40. PubMed ID: 1150416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.