These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664468)
21. Constitutional law: right to adequate psychiatric treatment--an illusory guarantee for the dangerous patient. Whitaker SL Univ Fla Law Rev; 1974; 27(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 11661190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment. Bailey WS; Pyfer JF Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment. Winthrop LF Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Minnesota Commitment Act of 1982: summary and analysis. Janus ES; Wolfson RM Hamline Law Rev; 1983 Feb; 6(1):41-94. PubMed ID: 11658497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Treating the mentally disordered offender: society's uncertain, conflicted, and changing views. Hafemeister TL; Petrila J Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1994; 21(3):729-871. PubMed ID: 11660258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The right to treatment--a "fabled" right receives judicial recognition in Missouri. Powell WJ Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(2):357-69. PubMed ID: 11665163 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of the opinions in Donaldson v. O'Connor and Wyatt v. Aderholt. Friedman P Ment Retard Law; 1974 Nov; ():1-6. PubMed ID: 11686181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The role of the court as mental health laws change. Flaschner FN Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions? Zenoff EH; Zients AB George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law. Wade MD Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Constitutional law--due process--right to treatment for nondangerous involuntarily civilly committed persons. Currie EJ Miss Law J; 1975; 46(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 11664483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment? Vermillion LJ ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. o'Connor v. Donaldson: involuntary civil commitment and the right to treatment. Baldwin D Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1975 Fall-1976 Winter; 7(2):573-89. PubMed ID: 11664644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Eighth Amendment right to treatment for involuntarily committed mental patients. Iowa Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 61(4):1057-79. PubMed ID: 11664638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An overview of state involuntary civil commitment statutes. Van Duizend R; McGraw BD; Keilitz I Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 11658581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature. Morris GH Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]