These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664469)
41. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy. Brooks AD Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. O'Connor v. Donaldson: a defacto right to treatment? Welch S Law Psychol Rev; 1977; 3():99-106. PubMed ID: 11665183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty". Hancock GC Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst. Ferleger D; Scott PM West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. The rights of mental patients. Ellis JW Ment Hyg; 1975; 59(3):35. PubMed ID: 11664515 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment? Lipscomb NI Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Constitutional requirements in the commitment of the mentally ill in the U.S.A.: rights to liberty and therapy. Flaschner FN Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 1974; 18(3):283-301. PubMed ID: 11664409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The right to treatment case--that wasn't. Mancilla J Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy. Shuman D Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo. Smith GG Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Civil commitment and the right to treatment. Kelly DS LA Law Rev; 1975; 35(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 11664468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term. Wing KR; Carman R Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded. Gallo LV Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis. Roberts TD Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review. Weiner BA Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]