147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664507)
21. Wyatt v. Aderholt. 8 Nov 1974.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1974; 503():1305-19. PubMed ID: 11646041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. States move to ease law committing mentally ill.
Goleman D
N Y Times Web; 1986 Dec; ():C1, C4. PubMed ID: 11647825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The right to be crazy.
Isaac RJ; Armat VC
Am Enterp; 1990; 1(5):34-42. PubMed ID: 11659838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Psychiatric care and the law of substitute decision-making.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1987; 11(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 11658868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines.
Wildgen JS
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Constitution v. the snakepit.
Goodman W
N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Treatment rights of mentally ill nursing home residents.
Barnett CF
Univ PA Law Rev; 1978 Jan; 126(3):578-629. PubMed ID: 11664875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Ethical issues in inpatient practice.
Sider RC
Psychiatr Med Update Mass Gen Hosp Rev Physicians; 1986; 4(4):445-54. PubMed ID: 11659331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The mentally ill homeless: evolving involuntary commitment issues.
Ludwig EV
Villanova Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 36(5):1085-111. PubMed ID: 11659576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Guidelines for involuntary civil commitment.
National Center for State Courts' Institute on Mental Disability and the Law
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1986; 10(5):409-514. PubMed ID: 11659039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Civil commitment decisionmaking: a report on one decisionmaker's experience.
Morris GH
South Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 61(2):291-351. PubMed ID: 11659028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Institutionalizing the rights of mental patients: committing the legislature.
Morris GH
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):957-1024. PubMed ID: 11663464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The role of the court as mental health laws change.
Flaschner FN
Ill Bar J; 1973 Nov; 62(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 11664277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The past and present of the right to treatment: a slogan gone astray.
Slovenko R
J Psychiatry Law; 1981; 9(3):263-82. PubMed ID: 11658289
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
