BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

656 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664510)

  • 1. Protecting the privacy of the absent patient: Rudnick v. Superior Court.
    Tarr RW
    Hastings Law J; 1975 Sep; 27(1):99-135. PubMed ID: 11664510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic information and third party access to information: New Jersey's pioneering legislation as a model for federal privacy protection of genetic information.
    Stepanuk NA
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1998; 47(3):1105-44. PubMed ID: 11660610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computerized medical records and the right to privacy: the emerging federal response.
    Boyer BB
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1975; 25(1):37-118. PubMed ID: 11664544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Congressman Jack Kemp introduces the proposed Medical Records Privacy Act of 1974.
    Kemp J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Oct; 120(158):H10679-83. PubMed ID: 11661140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A drug addict's right to anonymity.
    DeSabato AA
    Villanova Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 20(4):800-36. PubMed ID: 11664514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Policy-makers chip away at confidentiality protections.
    AIDS Policy Law; 1999 Aug; 14(15 Bonus Report):1-4. PubMed ID: 11660739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Privacy of medical records.
    Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Federal Legislation
    Rec Assoc Bar City New York; 1980 Nov; 35(8):488-514. PubMed ID: 11649553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical privacy: threatened but fighting back.
    Patient Care; 1975 Jan; 9(1):108-109+. PubMed ID: 11661198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The HIV-AIDS epidemic and the child welfare system: protecting the rights of infants, young children, and adolescents.
    English A
    Iowa Law Rev; 1992 May; 77(4):1509-60. PubMed ID: 11653374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent legislation on genetics and insurance.
    Davis HR; Mitrius JV
    Jurimetrics; 1996; 37(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 11658097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ethical aspects of genetic testing.
    Fruchtman CE; Pizzulli FC
    Whittier Law Rev; 1998; 20(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 11660804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autonomy and privacy: protecting patients from their physicians.
    Bobinski MA
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1994; 55(2):291-388. PubMed ID: 11659957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A guide to the new federal rules governing the confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records.
    Helms DJ
    Contemp Drug Probl; 1975; 4(3):259-83. PubMed ID: 11661264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health information privacy.
    Gostin LO
    Cornell Law Rev; 1995 Mar; 80(3):451-528. PubMed ID: 11660159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Privacy in personal medical information: a diagnosis.
    Newman S
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1981; 33(3):394-424. PubMed ID: 11649692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Privacy rights in medical records.
    Cleaver CM
    Fordham Urban Law J; 1984-1985; 13(1):165-204. PubMed ID: 11650743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution.
    O'Toole EM
    J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinton would broaden access of the police to medical records.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1997 Sep; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11648062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beyond Jaffee v. Redmond: should the federal courts recognize a right to physician-patient confidentiality?
    Silver SA
    Ohio State Law J; 1998; 58(5):1809-66. PubMed ID: 16211748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.