These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664528)
21. Civil commitment of the mentally ill in California: the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act. Hart MA Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1974 Feb; 7(1):93-136. PubMed ID: 11664312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The civilly-committed public mental patient and the right to aftercare. Saphire RB Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 4(2):232-95. PubMed ID: 11664639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes". McGovern JJ New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's. Perlin ML Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment. Grant GM Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness. Weissbourd R John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment? Howard SW Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Patients' rights vs. patients' needs: the right of the mentally ill to refuse treatment in Colorado. Shavill NL Denver Law J; 1981; 58(3):567-608. PubMed ID: 11662885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Mental health legislation and its relationship to program development: an international review. Harding TW; Curran WJ Harvard J Legis; 1979; 16(1):19-57. PubMed ID: 11665197 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Mental health advance directives: having one's say? Dunlap JA KY Law J; 2000; 89(2):327-86. PubMed ID: 12737165 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Law and the mentally ill. Tanay E Wayne Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 22(3):781-813. PubMed ID: 11664634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Paternalism, civil commitment and illness politics: assessing the current debate and outlining a future direction. Arrigo BA J Law Health; 1992-1993; 7(2):131-68. PubMed ID: 11652819 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Senate Bill 26--mental patients' bill of rights. Lynch FE; Neustrom PW Washburn Law J; 1976; 16(1):149-60. PubMed ID: 11664695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Civil commitment in Alabama. Segall RD Ala Law Rev; 1977; 26(1):215-71. PubMed ID: 11664721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment. Morris GH Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process and the involuntarily civilly committed mental patient. Wold SM Tulsa Law J; 1976; 11(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 11664640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Mental health law and the movement toward voluntary treatment. Wexler DB Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):671-92. PubMed ID: 11663460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]