BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664535)

  • 1. Informed consent--hospitals?
    Jacobson HL
    Fed Insur Couns Q; 1973; 23(2):9-26. PubMed ID: 11664535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
    Halligan PD
    LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patients' rights and informed consent: an emergency case for hospitals?
    Callan DE
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 12(2):406-28. PubMed ID: 11664656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Informed consent.
    Horan DJ; Halligan P
    Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
    Picard EI
    Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Responsibility and accountability in provider-patient relationships.
    Blumstein JF
    Circulation; 1982 Nov; 66(Suppl. III):91-9. PubMed ID: 11658401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Informed consent: looking for the action.
    Riskin LL
    Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule.
    Karlson HC; Erwin RD
    Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer?
    Bromberger B
    Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contract law as a viable alternative to problems of informed consent.
    Norton ML
    Cathol Lawyer; 1975; 21(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 11664527
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
    Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
    Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Confidences of malpractice plaintiffs: should their secrets be revealed?
    Turner JW
    South Tex Law Rev; 1987; 28(1):71-95. PubMed ID: 11650782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures.
    Skegg PD
    Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so!
    Maldonado JE
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 9(4):609-28. PubMed ID: 11664618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structuring the issues in informed consent.
    Somerville MA
    McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost containment and the standard of medical care.
    Morreim EH
    Calif Law Rev; 1987 Oct; 75(5):1719-63. PubMed ID: 11659107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Informed consent in medical practice.
    Zaslow J
    Pract Lawyer; 1976 Apr; 22(3):13-26. PubMed ID: 11664636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Following doctors' orders: informed consent in Australia.
    Manderson D
    Aust Law J; 1988 Jun; 62(6):430-40. PubMed ID: 11659118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
    Wallach DM; Berry SJ
    St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis.
    Monks SS
    Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.