848 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664543)
1. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guaranteeing the right to treatment.
Hoffman PB; Dunn RC
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):7-11+. PubMed ID: 11662297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
Roberts TD
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The civilly-committed public mental patient and the right to aftercare.
Saphire RB
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 4(2):232-95. PubMed ID: 11664639
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
Dix GE
St Marys Law J; 1984; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
Zenoff EH; Zients AB
George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In search of a sane commitment statute.
Treffert DA; Krajeck RW
Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment.
Stage GL
KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
