These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664552)
1. Rights of mentally ill--involuntary sterilization--analysis of recent statutes. Varner JA West VA Law Rev; 1975 Dec; 78(1):131-44. PubMed ID: 11664552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Validity of statutes authorizing asexualization or sterilization of criminals or mental defectives. Ghent JF Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1973; 53():960-96. PubMed ID: 12091928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution? Murdock CW Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation. Dunn R J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The sterilization of mentally retarded persons: the issues and conflicts. Paul EW Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1974 Oct; 3(5):96-9. PubMed ID: 11664325 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness. Baker JD Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore. Gauvey SK; Shuger NB Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions. Ross DH Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel. Henry NB North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights. Linn B Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From involuntary sterilization to genetic enhancement: the unsettled legacy of Buck v. Bell. Berry RM Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):401-48. PubMed ID: 12755089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient. Chernus RO NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden? Coleman SS S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Vermont's voluntary sterilization statutes and the rights of the mentally handicapped. Silverstein PH Vt Law Rev; 1979; 4(2):331-52. PubMed ID: 11665236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons. Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough. Estacio RA Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor. Spriggs EJ Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]