These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664560)

  • 1. doe v. Doe: the wife's right to an abortion over her husband's objections.
    Forman HM
    New Engl Law Rev; 1975; 11(1):205-24. PubMed ID: 11664560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981).
    Adams C
    Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The husband's rights in abortion.
    Etzioni A
    Trial; 1976 Nov; 12(11):56-8. PubMed ID: 11664680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Constitutional law--right to privacy--spousal consent to abortion: foreshadowing the fall of parental consent.
    Kenworthy L
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 9(3):841-72. PubMed ID: 11664519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say?
    Diggins M
    Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role.
    Witherspoon JP
    Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Notifying husbands about an abortion: an empirical look at constitutional and policy dilemmas.
    Plutzer E; Ryan B
    Sociol Soc Res; 1987 Apr; 71(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 11659056
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Poe v. Gerstein.
    Sanders AD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):531-47. PubMed ID: 11664627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spousal notification and consent in abortion situations: Scheinberg v. Smith.
    Wiemers D
    Houst Law Rev; 1982 Jul; 19(5):1025-39. PubMed ID: 11658560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The spousal notice and consultation requirement: a new approach to state regulation of abortion.
    Blum BG
    Nova Law J; 1982; 6(3):457-74. PubMed ID: 11658764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Woman's right to have abortion without consent of, or against objections of, child's father.
    Shipley WE
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1975; 62():1097-100. PubMed ID: 12085878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements.
    Rickless DM
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion: the father's rights.
    Gilbert RA
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi.
    Jackson CP
    Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the courts to stop abortion by injunction: Mock v. Brandanburg.
    Martin SL
    Can J Women Law; 1989-1990; 3(2):569-83. PubMed ID: 11659311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Doe v. Doe. 3 Jul 1974.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1974; 314():128-39. PubMed ID: 12038346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.