195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664563)
1. Forced medication: by whose right?
Paris JJ
America (NY); 1975 Nov; 133(15):323-5. PubMed ID: 11664563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Compulsory medical treatment and religious freedom: whose law shall prevail?
Paris JJ
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):1-35. PubMed ID: 11661287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Wons v. Public Health Trust of Dade County.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 11644332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
Watson SB
Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Mercy Hospital, Inc. v. Jackson: a recurring dilemma for health care providers in the treatment of Jehovah's Witnesses.
Bamberger DH
MD Law Rev; 1987; 46(3):514-32. PubMed ID: 11649934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Right to refuse blood transfusion.
Rubsamen DS
Med World News; 1974 Apr; 15(17):58. PubMed ID: 11661074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A pregnant mother's right to refuse treatment beneficial to her fetus: refusing blood transfusions.
Filkins JA
DePaul J Health Care Law; 1998; 2(2):361-83. PubMed ID: 11658074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
Moore ML
North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Freedom of religion versus civil authority in matters of health.
Flowers RB
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci; 1979 Nov; 446():149-61. PubMed ID: 11651749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transfusion refusal ruled mother's right.
Colen BD
Washington Post; 1974 Apr; ():B1+. PubMed ID: 11648657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Jehovah's Witness/blood transfusion dilemma.
O'Donnell TJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1982 Sep; 19(7):25-8. PubMed ID: 11649506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Praying for relief from parens patriae: should a child be allowed to refuse life-saving medical treatment on religious grounds?
Kessler DN
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):673-93. PubMed ID: 11650888
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Compulsory medical treatment of children: rights in conflict.
Dalcanton CL
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1973; 35(2):369-81. PubMed ID: 11664300
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The right of a patient to refuse blood transfusions: a dilemma of conscience and law for patient, physician and hospital.
Silbermann BD
Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1974; 3(1):91-104. PubMed ID: 11664351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Karen Quinlan case--a constitutional right to die?
Roddy JV
Chicago Bar Rec; 1976; 58(3):120-124+. PubMed ID: 11661598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The "Witnesses" could win.
Spencer JD
Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1978 Jun; 6(6):45-9. PubMed ID: 661475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constitutional law: forced medical treatment for adults and freedom of religion.
Hoster CW
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1973 Aug; 26(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 11661023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the Matter of Bentley. 25 Apr 1974.
District of Columbia. Superior Court
Dly Wash Law Report; 1974; 102(117):1221+, 17 Jun 1974. PubMed ID: 11645919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Malette v. Shulman: the requirement of consent in medical emergencies.
Siebrasse N
McGill Law J; 1989; 34(4):1080-98. PubMed ID: 11659256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
