These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
713 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664599)
1. Live birth: a condition precedent to recognition of rights. Crockett KG; Hyman M Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):805-36. PubMed ID: 11664599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life. Parness JA; Pritchard SK Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins. Crepps J; Miller A Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. House Joint Resolution 372: the Human Life Federalism Amendment. Ashbrook JM Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Dec; 127(185):H9407-9. PubMed ID: 11652376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Towards a practical implementation of the abortion decision: the interests of the physician, the woman and the fetus. Sebek M De Paul Law Rev; 1976; 25(3):676-706. PubMed ID: 11664630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The unborn child in Canadian law. Weiler KM; Catton K Osgoode Hall Law J; 1976 Dec; 14(3):643-59. PubMed ID: 11664746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The legal status of the embryo. Andrews LB Loyola Law Rev; 1986; 32(2):357-409. PubMed ID: 11658916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mama vs. fetus. Hornick HL Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Survey of abortion law. Platt JG; O'Malley K Ariz State Law J; 1980; 1980(1):67-216. PubMed ID: 11655392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal experimentation: legal implications of an ethical conundrum. Wilson JP Denver Law J; 1976; 53(4):581-642. PubMed ID: 11664590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]