These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664624)
1. Due process and equal protection: constitutional implications of abortion notice and reporting requirements. Rickless DM Boston Univ Law Rev; 1976 May; 56(3):522-41. PubMed ID: 11664624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--abortion--court focuses on husband's interest regarding spousal notification requirement to procure abortion: Scheinberg v. Smith, 659 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1981). Adams C Cumberland Law Rev; 1982-1983; 13(1):143-59. PubMed ID: 11658434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion: the father's rights. Gilbert RA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1973; 42(3):441-67. PubMed ID: 11664234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law -- Fifth Circuit holds that requiring the consent of both parents does not unduly burden a minor's right to abortion -- Barnes v. Mississippi. Jackson CP Temple Law Rev; 1994; 67(4):1357-86. PubMed ID: 11660074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird. Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes. Byrne TJ Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--privacy rights--consent requirements and abortions for minors. Crawford LD NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1981; 26(3):837-54. PubMed ID: 11658323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations. Baldwin ML UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent. Abbot L Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique. Embree MG; Dobson TA Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The father's rights in the abortion decision. Schultz WL Tex Tech Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):1075-94. PubMed ID: 11664508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--a minor's abortion right under a parental notice statute. Czarnecki MS Wayne Law Rev; 1982; 28(4):1901-28. PubMed ID: 11658440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Notifying husbands about an abortion: an empirical look at constitutional and policy dilemmas. Plutzer E; Ryan B Sociol Soc Res; 1987 Apr; 71(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 11659056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]