422 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664642)
21. Constitutional law--legislative naiveté in involuntary sterilization laws.
Shaw RH
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1976; 12(4):1064-81. PubMed ID: 11664745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Constitutional law--due process--North Carolina compulsory sterilization statute held constitutional against challenge that it constituted an unlawful invasion of privacy.
Weathered F
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 8(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 11664735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
Estacio RA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Sterilization regulations.
Kennedy EM
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1977 Dec; 123(197):S19808-14. PubMed ID: 11661674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights.
Linn B
Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel.
Henry NB
North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Sterilization of mentally retarded persons: reproductive rights and family privacy.
Scott ES
Duke Law J; 1986 Nov; 1986(5):806-65. PubMed ID: 11658848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient.
Chernus RO
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation.
Dunn R
J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Sterilization: coercing consent.
Babcock RF
Nation; 1974 Jan; 218(2):51-3. PubMed ID: 11662947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. HEW sterilization regulations.
Young RA
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1978 Mar; 124(36):E1272-3. PubMed ID: 11663047
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Sterilization, retardation, and parental authority.
Dodge GA
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(2):380-407. PubMed ID: 11664962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. HIV testing and insurance applicants: exploring constitutional alternatives to statutory protections.
Stone SE
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1992; 19(4):1163-95. PubMed ID: 11652114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Eugenics and the law's obligation to man.
Weigel CL; Tinkler SE
South Tex Law J; 1973; 14(3):361-91. PubMed ID: 11664216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons.
Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP
Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Sterilization abuse: current state of the law and remedies for abuse.
Grosboll D
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1980; 10(3):1147-89. PubMed ID: 11649446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Involuntary sexual sterilization of incompetents in Alabama: past, present, and future.
Larson EJ; Nelson LJ
Ala Law Rev; 1992; 43(2):399-444. PubMed ID: 11659705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Sterilization in Pennsylvania.
Beck PW; Soskis CW
Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(2):213-36. PubMed ID: 11652406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. HIV-specific crime legislation: targeting an epidemic for criminal prosecution.
O'Toole EM
J Law Health; 1995-1996; 10(1):183-208. PubMed ID: 11655191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception.
Mertus J; Heller S
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
