235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664646)
1. Forced drug medication of involuntarily committed mental patients.
Blais NR
St Louis Univ Law J; 1975; 20(1):100-19. PubMed ID: 11664646
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rights of involuntarily committed mental patients--freedom or treatment?
Howard SW
Univ San Fernando Valley Law Review; 1975; 4(2):277-87. PubMed ID: 11662235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
Robinson RM
Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
Herbert W
Sci News; 1982 Jun; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Constitutional law--the rights of involuntarily committed mentally retarded persons under the Fourteenth Amendment: Youngberg v. Romeo.
Smith GG
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1983; 31(3):451-66. PubMed ID: 12083080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
Hahn WA
Creighton Law Rev; 1982-1983; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Can mental patients say no to drugs?
Appelbaum PS
N Y Times Mag; 1982 Mar; ():46, 51-52, 54+. PubMed ID: 11658304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
Jernigan LT
North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Court-ordered electro-convulsion therapy for involuntarily committed mental patients: a right of choice?
Taylor-Dunn K
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1987-1988; 23(3):679-701. PubMed ID: 11659065
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Involuntary treatment: civilly committed patients may be involuntarily medicated; involuntary medication to restore competence to stand trial requires judicial approval.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):493-4. PubMed ID: 11645181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mental health--the right to refuse drug therapy under "emergency restraint statutes".
McGovern JJ
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):509-40. PubMed ID: 11664602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
Anderson K
Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mental patients' rights to refuse drugs: involuntary medication as cruel and unusual punishment.
Symonds E
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1980; 7(3):701-38. PubMed ID: 11664186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right of the civilly committed mental patient to refuse treatment.
Wellsch T
Sask Law Rev; 1983-1984; 48(2):269-91. PubMed ID: 11658817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
Cooper GG
Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
