These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664670)

  • 1. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment?
    Lipscomb NI
    Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
    Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release.
    Burnstin SM
    Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Involuntary psychiatry.
    Szasz TS
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
    Mancilla J
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
    Wallach S
    Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
    Grant GM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.