These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664693)
1. A hypothetical: Quinlan under Ohio law. Gerzog WC Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(1):145-69. PubMed ID: 11664693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision. Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In the Matter of Karen Quinlan. 31 Mar 1976. New Jersey. Supreme Court Atl Report; 1976; 355():647-72. PubMed ID: 11646053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Johnson SH St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Koop CE; Grant ER Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1986; 2(3):585-634. PubMed ID: 11650885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An overview of Georgia's living will legislation. Adams CR; Adams CT Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 36():45-75. PubMed ID: 11652443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Louisiana's Natural Death Act and dilemmas in medical ethics. Vitiello M LA Law Rev; 1985; 46(2):259-309. PubMed ID: 11649843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Where death begins while life continues. King DD; Roberts CE; Jefferson LS; Brody BA South Tex Law Rev; 1990 Feb; 31(1):145-90. PubMed ID: 11651056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rejection of extraordinary medical care by a terminal patient: a proposed living will statute. Freeman J Iowa Law Rev; 1979 Mar; 64(3):573-658. PubMed ID: 11665074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The living will: the final expression. Baker CH Leg Med Q; 1980; 4(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 11649353 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Death and dying in Tennessee. McKenney EJ Memphis State Univ Law Rev; 1977; 7(4):503-54. PubMed ID: 11663172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Living wills in New York: are they valid? Vile SE Syracuse Law Rev; 1987; 38(4):1369-95. PubMed ID: 11650137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. North Carolina's Natural Death Act: confronting death with dignity. Mitchell PR Wake Forest Law Rev; 1978 Aug; 14(4):771-95. PubMed ID: 11661623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In re Quinlan: defining the basis for terminating life support under the right of privacy. Smith WF Tulsa Law J; 1976; 12(1):150-67. PubMed ID: 11661422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to die. Brennan C New Law J; 1993 Jul; 143(6609):1041-2. PubMed ID: 11652271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity. Mulholland KA Indiana Law Rev; 1987; 20(4):859-78. PubMed ID: 11652514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Damage actions for nonconsensual life-sustaining medical treatment. Dooling RP St Louis Univ Law J; 1986; 30(3):895-918. PubMed ID: 11649881 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]