235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664714)
1. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights.
Linn B
Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
Baker JD
Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
Murdock CW
Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Constitutional law--legislative naiveté in involuntary sterilization laws.
Shaw RH
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1976; 12(4):1064-81. PubMed ID: 11664745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation.
Dunn R
J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
Coleman SS
S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sterilization, retardation, and parental authority.
Dodge GA
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1978; 1978(2):380-407. PubMed ID: 11664962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor.
Spriggs EJ
Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A geneticist's viewpoint towards sterilization.
Bender HA
Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 11664716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sterilizing the retarded: constitutional, statutory and policy alternatives.
Sherlock RK; Sherlock RD
North Carol Law Rev; 1982 Jun; 60(5):943-83. PubMed ID: 11658718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. When terminating parental rights is not enough: a new look at compulsory sterilization.
Blum ET
Georgia Law Rev; 1994; 28(4):977-1017. PubMed ID: 11653343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Developments--the family. V. Procreative rights.
Harv Law Rev; 1980 Apr; 93(6):1296-308. PubMed ID: 11665179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel.
Henry NB
North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women.
Cepko R
Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sterilization of mental defectives: compulsion and consent.
Comer D
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):174-98. PubMed ID: 11660881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Power of parent to have mentally defective child sterilized.
Trenkner TR
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1976; 74():1224-30. PubMed ID: 12091929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
Ross DH
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient.
Chernus RO
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The conflict between "disabling" and "enabling" paradigms in law: sterilization, the developmentally disabled, and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.
Dugan JC
Cornell Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 78(3):507-42. PubMed ID: 11659683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
