226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664723)
1. Postcommitment: an analysis and reevaluation of the right to treatment.
Foianini RA
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Dec; 51(2):287-302. PubMed ID: 11664723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
Miller HL
Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The new Ohio Mental Health Act.
Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ
Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new right to treatment.
Fremouw WJ
J Psychiatry Law; 1974; 2(1):7-32. PubMed ID: 11664337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
Belzer I
UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute.
Vater JA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment.
Bailey WS; Pyfer JF
Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Constitution v. the snakepit.
Goodman W
N Y Times Mag; 1974 p 21+; 17 Mar 1974():. PubMed ID: 11664311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
Ferleger D; Scott PM
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm.
Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R
Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future.
Wallach S
Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Wyatt v. Aderholt. 8 Nov 1974.
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Fed Report; 1974; 503():1305-19. PubMed ID: 11646041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Legal problems involved in implementing the right to treatment.
Morris GH
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1973 Jan; 1(1):1-37. PubMed ID: 11664496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The right to treatment and the psychiatric establishment.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Ann; 1974 Sep; 4(9):21-23+. PubMed ID: 11662954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment.
Stage GL
KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Behind the institutional wall.
Friedman PR
Trial; 1975; 11(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 11662206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
