These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

773 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664738)

  • 1. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
    Corbett KA; Raciti RM
    New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
    Williams SE
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
    Brant J
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In re Guardianship of Grant.
    Di Somma AV
    Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):105-12. PubMed ID: 11644469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
    Riga PJ
    Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
    Bates KW
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards.
    Gilman GS
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
    Krasik EB
    Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference.
    Richard SM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1989; 64(3):394-421. PubMed ID: 11659243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Therefore, choose death.
    Brown ML
    Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
    Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
    Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
    Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Virginia Natural Death Act--a critical analysis.
    Murphy JG
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1983; 17(4):863-79. PubMed ID: 11649800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
    Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
    KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
    Freamon BK
    Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative.
    Rubin BL
    Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saikewicz: nontreatment decisions for incompetents.
    Gamble HF
    Linacre Q; 1983 Aug; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11655586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conroy, best interests, and the handling of dying patients.
    Cantor NL
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1985; 37(3):543-77. PubMed ID: 11649747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The life support cases: myths and realities.
    Hartz JN
    Los Angel Lawyer; 1982; 5(5):18-20, 33, 52+. PubMed ID: 11653530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
    Paulus SM
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.