These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664750)

  • 1. Eugenic sterilization--involuntary sterilization statute upheld as constitutional.
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(2):344-9. PubMed ID: 11664750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In re Moore: the sound and the fury and the scalpel.
    Henry NB
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1977; 8(2):307-15. PubMed ID: 11664899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The permissibility of involuntary sterilization under the parens patriae and police power authority of the state: In re Sterilization of Moore.
    Gauvey SK; Shuger NB
    Univ Md Law Forum; 1976; 6(3):109-28. PubMed ID: 11664760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--legislative naiveté in involuntary sterilization laws.
    Shaw RH
    Wake Forest Law Rev; 1976; 12(4):1064-81. PubMed ID: 11664745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eugenic sterilization statutes: a constitutional re-evaluation.
    Dunn R
    J Fam Law; 1975; 14(2):280-308. PubMed ID: 11662978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Constitutional law--due process--North Carolina compulsory sterilization statute held constitutional against challenge that it constituted an unlawful invasion of privacy.
    Weathered F
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1976; 8(2):436-45. PubMed ID: 11664735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity of statutes authorizing asexualization or sterilization of criminals or mental defectives.
    Ghent JF
    Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1973; 53():960-96. PubMed ID: 12091928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual sterilization--constitutional validity of involuntary sterilization and consent determinative of voluntariness.
    Baker JD
    Miss Law Rev; 1975; 40(3):509-26. PubMed ID: 11664500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substantive due process--compulsory sterilization of the mentally deficient.
    Chernus RO
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1977; 23(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 11664850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Involuntary sterilization of the mentally retarded: blessing or burden?
    Coleman SS
    S D Law Rev; 1980; 25(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 11665097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The wicked witch is almost dead: Buck v. Bell and the sterilization of handicapped persons.
    Burgdorf RL; Burgdorf MP
    Temple Law Q; 1977; 50(4):995-1034. PubMed ID: 11664886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. North Carolina Association for Retarded Children v. State of North Carolina. 1 Oct 1976.
    U.S. District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division
    Fed Suppl; 1976; 420():451-9. PubMed ID: 11646062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compulsory sterilization: equal protection and the quality of life.
    Gressel M
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1977; 2(2):327-39. PubMed ID: 11664942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sterilization of the mentally disabled in Pennsylvania: three generations without legislative guidance are enough.
    Estacio RA
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1988; 92(2):409-36. PubMed ID: 11659036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Involuntary sterilization--a constitutional awakening to fundamental human rights.
    Linn B
    Amicus; 1977 Feb; 2(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 11664714
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Compulsory sterilization: weeding Mendel's garden.
    Richardson JM
    Drake Law Rev; 1973 Jan; 22(2):355-64. PubMed ID: 11662932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Voluntary sterilization for persons with mental disabilities: the need for legislation.
    Burnett BA
    Syracuse Law Rev; 1981; 32(4):913-55. PubMed ID: 11658516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sterilization of the developmentally disabled: shedding some myth-conceptions.
    Ross DH
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1981; 9(4):599-643. PubMed ID: 11658741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Involuntary sterilization: an unconstitutional menace to minorities and the poor.
    Spriggs EJ
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(2):127-51. PubMed ID: 11664642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sterilization of the retarded: a problem or a solution?
    Murdock CW
    Calif Law Rev; 1974 May; 62(3):917-35. PubMed ID: 11663463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.