These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664763)

  • 1. Abortion: an unresolved issue--are parental consent statutes unconstitutional?
    Stick RS
    Neb Law Rev; 1976; 55(2):256-82. PubMed ID: 11664763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restrictions on the abortion rights of minors: Bellotti v. Baird.
    Harv Womens Law J; 1980; 3(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 11658352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minors and contraceptives: a constitutional issue.
    Bodine N
    Ecol Law Q; 1973; 3(4):843-67. PubMed ID: 11664260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constitutional law--privacy rights--consent requirements and abortions for minors.
    Crawford LD
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1981; 26(3):837-54. PubMed ID: 11658323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes.
    Byrne TJ
    Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A deceptive liberty: the Supreme Court, minors, and abortion.
    Donnelly TP
    Georgetown Univ Right to Life J; 1983; 3():15-22. PubMed ID: 11655594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consent question--parental and spousal consent for abortions.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1976 Sep; 32(9):27-30. PubMed ID: 11664739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
    Lozano GD
    St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical decision making for children: an analysis of competing interests.
    Ewald LS
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1982 Oct; 25(4):689-733. PubMed ID: 11658427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minor's right to abortion: the status of minority is not a constitutionally permissable standard upon which the state may limit abortion by requiring parental consent.
    Gonzaga Law Rev; 1975; 10(3):907-18. PubMed ID: 11664546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements violate right to privacy in abortion decision.
    Sanders JE
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 24(2):446-62. PubMed ID: 11664628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical treatment for minor children: the roles of parents, the state, the child, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
    Crutchfield CF
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 11651710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abortion--possible alternatives to unconstitutional spousal and parental consent provisions of Missouri's abortion law.
    Crist-Brown B
    Miss Law Rev; 1977; 42(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11664833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
    Pirner RK; Williams LB
    Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supreme Court to review abortion consent law.
    Goren T
    Ob Gyn News; 1978 Dec; 13(24):3+. PubMed ID: 11665058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parent, child, and the decision to abort: a critique of the Supreme Court's statutory proposal in Bellotti v. Baird.
    Watts WW
    South Calif Law Rev; 1979 Sep; 52(6):1869-915. PubMed ID: 11665145
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A chance to be heard: an application of Bellotti v. Baird to the civil commitment of minors.
    Butler KA
    Hastings Law J; 1981 May; 32(5):1285-318. PubMed ID: 11658348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.