These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664776)
21. Beyond Rouse and Wyatt: an administrative law model for expanding and implementing the mental patient's right to treatment. Hoffman PB; Dunn RC Va Law Rev; 1975 Mar; 61(2):297-340. PubMed ID: 11664472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Developments in the law: civil commitment of the mentally ill. Harv Law Rev; 1974 Apr; 87(6):1190-406. PubMed ID: 11664523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Voluntarily confined mental retardates: the right to treatment vs. the right to protection from harm. Barshefsky C; Liebenberg R Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1974; 23(4):787-805. PubMed ID: 11664363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Rights of institutionalized mental patients: issues, implications, and proposed guidelines. Wildgen JS Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):63-85. PubMed ID: 11663733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. In search of a sane commitment statute. Treffert DA; Krajeck RW Psychiatr Ann; 1976 Jun; 6(6):56-57+. PubMed ID: 11662296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. On the emancipation of mental patients. Slovenko R; Luby ED J Psychiatry Law; 1975; 3(2):191-213. PubMed ID: 11664507 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Wyatt case: implementation of a judicial decree ordering institutional change. Yale Law J; 1975 May; 84(6):1338-79. PubMed ID: 11662969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question. Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Revising Pennsylvania's involuntary civil commitment statute. Vater JA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):180-93. PubMed ID: 11664513 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded. Gallo LV Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Wyatt v. King. U.S. District Court, M.D. Alabama, N.D Fed Suppl; 1992 May; 793():1058-79. PubMed ID: 11648254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deprivation of liberty and the right to treatment. Bailey WS; Pyfer JF Clgh Rev; 1974 Jan; 7(9):519-28. PubMed ID: 11664309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Court decisions and the social services. Johnson FM Soc Work; 1975 Sep; 20(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 11662981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mental health and developmental disabilities code. Illinois Smith-Hurd Ill Annot Statut Ill; 1983-1984; ChaPter 91.1.2 Sections 1.100 to 6.107(Suppl):. PubMed ID: 12043648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. High court establishes rights for retarded in institutions. Barbash F Washington Post; 1982 Jun; ():A1, A5. PubMed ID: 11647762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A constitutional right to treatment: past, present, and future. Wallach S Prof Psychol; 1976 Nov; 7(4):453-67. PubMed ID: 11664666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment. Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Romeo, Romeo, where art thou Romeo: before the court at the mercy of institutional professionals. Meyer SM; Soskin RM J Psychiatry Law; 1982; 10(2):205-22. PubMed ID: 11658596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]