401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664781)
1. Involuntary psychiatry.
Szasz TS
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
Winthrop LF
Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
Fields JD
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson: a reply to Bernard.
Siegel RA
Am Psychol; 1978 Sep; 33(9):858-61. PubMed ID: 11643479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
Anderson K
Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
Muller MJ
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
Bliss TP
Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
Jernigan LT
North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment.
Roth LH
Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
Brooks AD
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
Trotter RJ
Sci News; 1975 Jul; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.
Schwartz BM
Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Kenneth Donaldson's fight for freedom.
Steinzor R
Progressive; 1977 Apr; 41(4):48-50. PubMed ID: 11665041
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
Wade MD
Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
King P
J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
