367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664793)
1. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
Hancock GC
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Constitutional law--right to liberty--involuntary confinement of mental patients.
Tenn Law Rev; 1976; 43(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 11664691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment--absent treatment, a nondangerous mentally ill person able to survive safely in society has a constitutional right to release.
Burnstin SM
Wash Law Rev; 1976 Jul; 51(3):764-90. PubMed ID: 11664654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
Muller MJ
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
Fields JD
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
Concemi M
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Constitutional law--involuntary commitment of nondangerous persons.
Hakes PJ
Tulane Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 50(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 11664608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
Cooper GG
Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
Weissbourd R
John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment?
Lipscomb NI
Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The right to treatment case--that wasn't.
Mancilla J
Univ Miami Law Rev; 1976; 30(2):486-98. PubMed ID: 11664663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Donaldson, dangerousness, and the right to treatment.
Grant GM
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1976; 3(2):599-627. PubMed ID: 11664729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
Bliss TP
Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
Cort RS
UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
Parry J
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Due process--involuntary civil confinement: a right to rehabilitative treatment?
Vermillion LJ
ISL Law Rev; 1976; 1(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 11664678
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
Anderson K
Rev Law Soc Change; 1976; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Overt dangerous behavior as a constitutional requirement for involuntary civil commitment of the mentally ill.
Groethe R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1977; 44(3):562-93. PubMed ID: 11664853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
