These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
470 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664799)
21. State prohibition of fetal experimentation and the fundamental right of privacy. Clapp MJ Columbia Law Rev; 1988 Jun; 88(5):1073-97. PubMed ID: 11659043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Much research blocked by fetus law. Cohn V Washington Post; 1975 Jan; ():A9. PubMed ID: 11649115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. ACOG criticizes proposal to curtail fetal and infant research. Miller RH Ob Gyn News; 1982 Nov 1-14; 17(21):1, 31. PubMed ID: 11658374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A "no" to research on aborted, live fetuses. Malloy MT Natl Obs; 1973 Apr; ():4. PubMed ID: 11649103 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. When abortions save lives. Thompson D Time; 1992 Apr; ():52-3. PubMed ID: 11659436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The impact on fetal research of the report of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Levine RJ Villanova Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 22(2):367-83. PubMed ID: 11664798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Law, policy and personhood in the context of the techniques of human experimentation in modern medicine. Hicks SC Cap Univ Law Rev; 1990; 19(2):255-99. PubMed ID: 11659475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Fetal research and public policy. McCormick RA; Walters L America (NY); 1975 Jun; 132(24):473-6. PubMed ID: 11664448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The Senate's definition of voluntary and informed consent: another view. Katz J IRB; 1980; 2(6):5-7. PubMed ID: 11661804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Proposed regulations on fetal research--and some reactions! Contemp Ob Gyn; 1975 Nov; 6(5):31-3. PubMed ID: 11664652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Experimentation on humans in biomedical research: implications for the industry of recent legislation and cases. Standridge LW Women Lawyers J; 1977; 63(3):88-95. PubMed ID: 11663032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. National Biomedical Research Fellowship, Traineeship, and Training Act of 1973. Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1973 May; 119(82):H4164-79. PubMed ID: 11663376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The federal fetal experimentation regulations: an establishment clause analysis. Friedman JM Minn Law Rev; 1977 Jun; 61(6):961-1005. PubMed ID: 11664831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Evolving conceptualizations of property: a proposal to de-commercialize the value of fetal tissue. Field NE Yale Law J; 1989 Oct; 99(1):169-86. PubMed ID: 11659215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation. Ratnoff MF Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Amendment offered by Mr. Roncallo of New York. Roncallo Ae Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1974 Apr; 120(57):H3247-55. PubMed ID: 11664319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]