457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664810)
1. Informed consent to participate in research: Part II.
Levine RJ
Bioethics Dig; 1977 Apr; 1(12):1-16. PubMed ID: 11664810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent process and document is criticized in court.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Dec; 9(12):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Research subject loses case against physician, IRB, and hospital.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Feb; 10(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 11654160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Annual review: observed deficiencies and suggested corrections.
Adams MS; Conrad DA
IRB; 1996; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11654743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics in neurobiological research with human subjects -- final reflections.
Katz J
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):277-83. PubMed ID: 11654523
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hospital failed on human research policy.
Science; 1998 Nov; 282(5391):1035. PubMed ID: 11645114
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Changing federal regulation of IRB's: the Commission's recommendations and the FDA's proposals.
Levine RJ
IRB; 1979 Mar; 1(1):1-3+. PubMed ID: 11662736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Proposed requirements for informed consent go beyond current federal regulations.
Hum Res Rep; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1-3. PubMed ID: 11659879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The FDA's final regulations: IRBs and medical devices.
Holder AR
IRB; 1980; 2(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11661803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent in psychiatric research.
Roth LH; Appelbaum PS; Lidz CW; Benson P; Winslade WJ
Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):425-41. PubMed ID: 11659013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Federal agency's final rule says informed consent forms must be dated.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1996 Dec; 11(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11655034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks.
Puglisi JT; Ellis GB
Account Res; 1996; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The FDA's enforcement of IRBs and patient informed consent.
Kelsey FO
Food Drug Cosmet Law J; 1989 Jan; 44(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11651627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
Smith ML
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal and financial encumbrances to clinical research.
Sonnenreich MR
Perspect Biol Med; 1980 Pt 2): S120-S149, Winter; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 11663072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
