These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664823)

  • 1. The validity of parental consent statutes after Planned Parenthood.
    Talbert JT
    J Urban Law; 1977; 54(1):127-64. PubMed ID: 11664823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court curbs family veto on abortion.
    MacKenzie JP
    Washington Post; 1976 Jul; ():A1+. PubMed ID: 11648683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion statutes after Danforth: an examination.
    Moss GW
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):537-67. PubMed ID: 11663802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Third party consent to abortions before and after Danforth: a theoretical analysis.
    Schell MS
    J Fam Law; 1976; 15(3):508-36. PubMed ID: 11663801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A deceptive liberty: the Supreme Court, minors, and abortion.
    Donnelly TP
    Georgetown Univ Right to Life J; 1983; 3():15-22. PubMed ID: 11655594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding the United States Supreme Court's position on parental consent requirements: in defense of Danforth and Bellotti--a response to Crutchfield.
    Rodman H
    Fam Relat; 1981 Apr; 30(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 11651712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
    Frame DW
    West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion and privacy: a woman's right to self determination.
    Kraus AR
    Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1978; 10(1):173-93. PubMed ID: 11664982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supreme Court to review abortion consent law.
    Goren T
    Ob Gyn News; 1978 Dec; 13(24):3+. PubMed ID: 11665058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion: an unresolved issue--are parental consent statutes unconstitutional?
    Stick RS
    Neb Law Rev; 1976; 55(2):256-82. PubMed ID: 11664763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. American Academy of Pediatrics v. Lungren: California's parental consent to abortion statute and the right to privacy.
    Grimm M
    Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1995; 25(3):463-512. PubMed ID: 11656562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Constitutional law--due process--a state abortion statute that imposes a blanket parental consultation requirement on minors...constitutes a denial of due process.
    Wambeke AM
    J Urban Law; 1980; 57(2):337-63. PubMed ID: 11662839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Constitution and the anomaly of the pregnant teenager.
    Buchanan E
    Ariz Law Rev; 1982; 24(3):553-610. PubMed ID: 11658425
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parental consent abortion statutes: the limits of state power.
    Wand BF
    Indiana Law J; 1977; 52(4):837-50. PubMed ID: 11664862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.