718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664849)
1. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent.
Brant J
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
Williams SE
Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciding right-to-die cases involving incompetent patients: Jones v. Saikewicz.
Schultz S; Swartz W; Appelbaum JC
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):936-58. PubMed ID: 11664848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides?
Corbett KA; Raciti RM
New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Therefore, choose death.
Brown ML
Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Euthanasia, the right to die and privacy: observations on some recent cases.
Riga PJ
Linc Law Rev; 1980; 11(2):109-65. PubMed ID: 11658630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Refusing life-sustaining treatment for incompetent patients: mere existence or a quality life?
Cerminara KL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1988; 35(2):121-45. PubMed ID: 11652537
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Right to die" cases: a model for judicial decision-making?
Webster WL
N Y Law School Hum Rights Annu; 1990; 7(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 11652592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
Bates KW
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
Davis PK
Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal aspects of the right to die: before and after the Quinlan decision.
Becker D; Fleming R; Overstreet R
KY Law J; 1977; 65(4):823-79. PubMed ID: 11661533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Death with dignity laws: a plea for uniform legislation.
Freamon BK
Seton Hall Legis J; 1982; 5(2):105-47. PubMed ID: 11651748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of the family in medical decisionmaking for incompetent adult patients: a historical perspective and case analysis.
Krasik EB
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1987; 48(2):539-618. PubMed ID: 11658944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. In the matter of Mary Hier.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1986 Mar; 1(5):413-6. PubMed ID: 11644048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In re Storar: euthanasia for incompetent patients, a proposed model.
Haber JG
Pace Law Rev; 1983; 3(2):351-74. PubMed ID: 11658505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
Eisenberg KG
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right to die: an exercise of informed consent, not an extension of the constitutional right to privacy.
Lyon EA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1990; 58(4):1367-95. PubMed ID: 11659504
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Family law--guardians of incompetent persons can refuse life-prolonging treatment for their wards.
Gilman GS
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1978; 12(4):1039-57. PubMed ID: 11662777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
