459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664859)
1. Recombinant DNA and technology assessment.
Georgetown Law J; 1977; 11(4):785-878. PubMed ID: 11664859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research.
Chalker SM; Catz RS
Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Recombinant DNA: legal responses to a new biohazard.
Balmer TA
Environ Law; 1977; 7(2):293-313. PubMed ID: 11661448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after.
Barkstrom JE
Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research.
Chalfant JC; Hartmann ME; Blakeboro A
Ecol Law Q; 1979; 8(1):55-129. PubMed ID: 11665069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1984 Nov; 49(227):46266-91. PubMed ID: 11655642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control.
Rosenblatt DP
Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Regulation of genetic engineering: less concern about Frankensteins but time for action on commercial production.
Karny GM
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):815-68. PubMed ID: 11649588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1984 Apr; 49(81):17844-8. PubMed ID: 11655581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Molecular biology or molecular politics? The production of scientific consensus on the hazards of recombinant DNA technology.
Wright S
Soc Stud Sci; 1986 Nov; 16(4):593-620. PubMed ID: 11650809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation.
Talbot B
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):804-14. PubMed ID: 11649587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA and the law: review of some general legal considerations.
Korwek EL
Gene; 1981; 15():1-5. PubMed ID: 11658461
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional biosafety committees and the inadequacies of risk regulation.
Bereano PL
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(4):16-34. PubMed ID: 11649608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Corporate responsibility for recombinant DNA activities.
Berger BA
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1981; 12(4):913-24. PubMed ID: 11649592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Recombinant DNA research: revised guidelines.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1978 Dec; 43(247):60080-105. PubMed ID: 11645390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doubts over genetic engineering controls.
Wright S
New Sci; 1976 Dec; 72(1029):520-1. PubMed ID: 11663697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating biotechnology.
McGarity TO
Issues Sci Technol; 1985; 1(3):40-56. PubMed ID: 11649701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The double helix of self-interest.
Simring FR
Sciences (New York); 1977; 17(3):10-13+. PubMed ID: 11661478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Does genetic engineering need genetic engineers?: should the regulation of genetic engineering include a new professional discipline?
Auchincloss S
Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1993; 20(1):37-63. PubMed ID: 11652234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Regulating the environmental release of genetically engineered organisms: Foundation on Economic Trends v. Heckler.
Pendorf S
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1985; 12(4):891-921. PubMed ID: 11653640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
