384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664868)
41. Parental opinions on treatment decisions for myelomeningocele infants: a descriptive study.
Jacobs RA; Negrete V; Johnson M; Korsch BM
Z Kinderchir; 1989 Dec; 44(Suppl. I):11-3. PubMed ID: 11653902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Defective newborns: inconsistent application of legal principles emphasized by the Infant Doe case.
Baumgardner KL
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1983; 14(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11651729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. 'Government directive on infant euthanasia is ambiguous.
Klug J
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 15-31; 17(16):11. PubMed ID: 11653462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Weber v. Stony Brook Hospital.
New York. Court of Appeals
North East Rep Second Ser; 1983 Oct; 456():1186-8. PubMed ID: 12041207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Euthanasia questions stir new debate.
Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Baby Jane Doe: the ethical issues.
Conley JJ
America (NY); 1984 Feb; 150(5):84-9. PubMed ID: 11658402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. To save or let die.
Zachary RB
Tablet; 1978 Feb; 232(7181):174-5. PubMed ID: 11663052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
Phillips CA
Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Choices for a child: an ethical and legal analysis of a failed surrogate birth contract.
Marshall A
Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1996 Jan; 30(1):275-302. PubMed ID: 11656855
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Withholding treatment from defective newborns: substituted judgment, informed consent, and the Quinlan decision.
Sargeant KJ
Gonzaga Law Rev; 1978; 13(3):781-811. PubMed ID: 11664980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Attitudes to the abnormal child.
Zachary R
Doc Med Ethics; 1974 Apr 1974, 4 p 3; No():. PubMed ID: 11662939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. U.S. panel calls for patients' right to end life.
Schmeck HM
N Y Times Web; 1983 Mar; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11647772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Of morals and mercy.
Barrie H
Am J Dis Child; 1982 Dec; 136(12):1100-1. PubMed ID: 12083074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Intensive care of extremely premature newborns.
Joseph R
Singapore J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jul; 20(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 11659322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A right to die?
Clark Me
Newsweek; 1975 Nov; 86(18):58-60+. PubMed ID: 11664452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Parents refuse to allow life-saving treatment for newborn: our moral obligation.
Otten M
Princet J Bioeth; 1998; 1(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 11657340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Should we let that child die?
Guentert K; Reich WT
US Cathol; 1975 Oct; 40(10):6-13. PubMed ID: 11662967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Iafelice by Iafelice v. Zarafu.
Kirkpatrick GA
Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):239-40. PubMed ID: 11644328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine: its view of the right to life.
Dyck AJ
Linacre Q; 1985 May; 52(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 11650751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Whatever happened to the Danville Siamese twins?
Steinbock B
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Aug; 17(4):3-4. PubMed ID: 11653782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
