These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664885)
1. The specter of Joseph Saikewicz: mental incompetence and the law. McCormick RA; Hellegers AE America (NY); 1978 Apr; 138(12):257-60. PubMed ID: 11664885 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The case of Joseph Saikewicz. Annas GJ New Physician; 1979 Mar; 28(3):45-46+. PubMed ID: 11664987 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment for the terminally ill incompetent: who decides--courts or physicians? Ayd FJ Med Moral Newsl; 1978 Apr; 15(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 11664882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withholding of life-supporting treatment from the mentally incompetent. Paris JJ Linacre Q; 1978 Aug; 45(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 11661604 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Superintendent of Belchertown v. Saikewicz. 28 Nov 1977. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Hampshire North East Rep Second Ser; 1977; 370():417-35. PubMed ID: 12038337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. Buchanan AE UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan. Bennett SA Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The right to die in peace: substituted consent and the mentally incompetent. Brant J Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1977; 11(4):959-73. PubMed ID: 11664849 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Last rights: an analysis of refusal and withholding of treatment cases. Brant J Miss Law Rev; 1981; 46(2):337-70. PubMed ID: 11651657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar. Williams SE Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. Colabrese CA Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medico-legal implications of "orders not to resuscitate. Tecklenburg N Cathol Univers Law Rev; 1982; 31(3):515-37. PubMed ID: 11649468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Saikewicz case sparks interest in living will. Euthanasia News; 1978; 4(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11664926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment. Davis PK Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model. Dunphy SM; Cross JH West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Therefore choose death? Appelbaum PS; Klein JI Commentary; 1986 Apr; 81(4):23-9. PubMed ID: 11658682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases. King JC Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Rubin BL Columbia J Law Soc Probl; 1985; 19(1):19-68. PubMed ID: 11658755 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]