122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664926)
1. The Saikewicz case sparks interest in living will.
Euthanasia News; 1978; 4(2):5-6. PubMed ID: 11664926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
New Physician; 1979 Mar; 28(3):45-46+. PubMed ID: 11664987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The specter of Joseph Saikewicz: mental incompetence and the law.
McCormick RA; Hellegers AE
America (NY); 1978 Apr; 138(12):257-60. PubMed ID: 11664885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withholding of life-supporting treatment from the mentally incompetent.
Paris JJ
Linacre Q; 1978 Aug; 45(3):237-48. PubMed ID: 11661604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.
Gilbert LJ
J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(1):111-33. PubMed ID: 11659441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. State court rejects 'Quinlan' doctrine.
Med World News; 1978 Mar; 19(5):68. PubMed ID: 11645652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
Hodgman DR; Frazer QR
Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients.
Colabrese CA
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1982; 43(4):1087-107. PubMed ID: 11658613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical decisionmaking for incompetent persons: the Massachusetts substituted judgment model.
Dunphy SM; Cross JH
West New Engl Law Rev; 1987; 9(1):153-67. PubMed ID: 11649910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Constitutional law--right of privacy--qualified right to refuse medical treatment may be asserted for incompetent under doctrine of substituted judgment.
Davis PK
Emory Law J; 1978; 27(2):425-60. PubMed ID: 11665011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment for the terminally ill incompetent: who decides--courts or physicians?
Ayd FJ
Med Moral Newsl; 1978 Apr; 15(4):13-6. PubMed ID: 11664882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The due process of dying.
Flick MR
Calif Law Rev; 1991 Jul; 79(4):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11659478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Saikewicz: nontreatment decisions for incompetents.
Gamble HF
Linacre Q; 1983 Aug; 50(3):234-41. PubMed ID: 11655586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Recent developments in the law governing medical treatment for older people and people with disabilities.
National Legal Center for the Medically Dependent and Disabled
Clgh Rev; 1988 May; 22(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 11652540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The search for objectivity in applying the substituted judgment rule in medical care cases.
King JC
Boston Bar J; 1993; 37(17):10-12, 14. PubMed ID: 11652649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The incompetent's right to die: the case of Joseph Saikewicz.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Feb; 8(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 624618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
Buchanan AE
UCLA Law Rev; 1981; 29(2):386-408. PubMed ID: 11660397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Termination of medical treatment.
Horan DJ
Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Court's role in decisionmaking involving incompetent refusals of life-sustaining care and psychiatric medications.
Parry JW
Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1990; 14(6):468-76. PubMed ID: 11659325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
