These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664952)
1. Civil commitment. Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1977; 2(1):73-126. PubMed ID: 11664952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment. Schwartz BM Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new Ohio Mental Health Act. Gui J; Bradin SS; Lavin JJ Akron Law Rev; 1977; 11(1):104-81. PubMed ID: 11665001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Advances in mental health: a case for the right to refuse treatment. Levick M; Wapner A Temple Law Q; 1975; 48(2):354-83. PubMed ID: 11664437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values. Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law. Wade MD Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment. Winthrop LF Calif West Law Rev; 1976; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Involuntary civil commitment: the right to treatment and the right to refuse treatment. Roth LH Psychiatr Ann; 1977 May; 7(5):50-51+. PubMed ID: 11664817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rights within the therapeutic relationship. King P J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Involuntary civil commitment of the non-dangerous mentally ill: substantive limitations. Wiehl DW S D Law Rev; 1973; 18(2):407-22. PubMed ID: 11664229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill. Stromberg CD; Stone AA Harvard J Legis; 1983; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Civil commitment of the mentally ill: compelling arguments for reform. Price DP Med Law Rev; 1994; 2(3):321-52. PubMed ID: 11657030 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill. Fields JD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment. Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Without more": a constitutional right to treatment? Lipscomb NI Loyola Law Rev; 1975 Winter 1975; 22(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 11664670 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ulysses and the psychiatrists: a legal and policy analysis of the voluntary commitment contract. Dresser RS Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1982; 16(3):777-854. PubMed ID: 11659391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients. Belzer I UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pennsylvania's new Mental Health Procedures Act: due process and the right to treatment for the mentally ill. Lundeen PA Dickinson Law Rev; 1977; 81(3):627-47. PubMed ID: 11664828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Bound to freedom: the Ulysses contract and the psychiatric will. Macklin A Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1987; 45(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11659143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]