376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664959)
1. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: the duty to warn--common law and statutory problems for California psychotherapists.
Cohen RN
Calif West Law Rev; 1978; 14(1):153-82. PubMed ID: 11664959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapists, policemen and the duty to warn--an unreasonable extension of the common law?
Kaplan RB
Gold Gate Law Rev; 1975; 6(1):229-48. PubMed ID: 11661331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California: the psychotherapist's peril.
Valentine GH
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1975; 37(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 11664512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The psychiatric duty to warn: walking a tightrope of uncertainty.
McClarren GM
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1987; 56(1):269-93. PubMed ID: 11658955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Untangling Tarasoff: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California.
Seligman BS
Hastings Law J; 1977 Sep; 29(1):179-210. PubMed ID: 11661581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California: psychotherapist's obligation of confidentiality versus the duty to warn.
Nesbitt NA
Tulsa Law J; 1977; 12(4):747-57. PubMed ID: 11661722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The dangerous patient exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege: the Tarasoff duty and the Jaffee footnote.
Harris GC
Wash Law Rev; 1999 Jan; 74(1):33-68. PubMed ID: 11865923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The dangerous patient exception and the duty to warn: creation of a dangerous precedent?
Lee V
Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1976; 9():549-68. PubMed ID: 11664780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California--risk allocation in mental health care: whether to treat the patient or his victim.
Lowe RH
Utah Law Rev; 1975; 1975(2):553-69. PubMed ID: 11658320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Negligence--physicians and surgeons--duty imposed on psychotherapists to exercise reasonable care to warn potential victims of foreseeably imminent dangers posed by mentally ill patients.
Malcolm JJ
Seton Hall Law Rev; 1975; 6(3):536-50. PubMed ID: 11664475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Warning third parties: the ripple effects of Tarasoff.
Rosenhan DL; Teitelbaum TW; Teitelbaum KW; Davidson M
Pac Law J; 1993 Apr; 24(3):1165-232. PubMed ID: 11660219
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Tarasoff: five years later.
Knapp S; Vandecreek L
Prof Psychol; 1982 Aug; 13(4):511-5. PubMed ID: 11658658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. 1 Jul 1976.
California. Supreme Court, In Bank
Wests Calif Report; 1976; 131():14-42. PubMed ID: 11646056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Where the public peril begins: a survey of psychotherapists to determine the effects of Tarasoff.
Wise TP
Stanford Law Rev; 1978 Nov; 31(1):165-90. PubMed ID: 11665029
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Imposing a duty to warn on psychiatrists--a judicial threat to the psychiatric profession.
Olsen TA
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1977; 48(2):283-310. PubMed ID: 11664713
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Tarasoff and the dilemma of the dangerous patient: new directions for the 1990's.
Perlin ML
Law Psychol Rev; 1992; 16():29-63. PubMed ID: 11659689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Lipari v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
U.S. District Court, D. Nebraska
Fed Suppl; 1980 Jul; 497():185-97. PubMed ID: 11648449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The evolution of Tarasoff: recent developments in the psychiatrist's duties to warn potential victims, protect the public, and predict dangerousness.
Greenberg LT
J Psychiatry Law; 1984; 12(3):315-48. PubMed ID: 11658762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical and psychotherapy privileges and confidentiality: on giving with one hand and removing with the other.
Smith SR
KY Law J; 1986-1987; 75(3):473-557. PubMed ID: 11651896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Violent patients and the Tarasoff duty in private psychiatric practice.
Beck JC
J Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(3-4):361-76. PubMed ID: 11649765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
