197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664967)
1. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent.
Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Seidelson DE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.
Meisel A
Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Informed consent--a fairy tale? Law's vision.
Katz J
Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1977; 39(2):137-74. PubMed ID: 11661530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
Holmstrom JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
Penhallegon JR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent: risk disclosure and the Canadian approach.
Jazvac WP
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1978; 36(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 11664977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The two schools of thought and informed consent doctrines in Pennsylvania: a model for integration.
Dailey JP
Dickinson Law Rev; 1994; 98(4):713-37. PubMed ID: 11656548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Who's afraid of informed consent? An affirmative approach to the medical malpractice crisis.
Fierstein RK
Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(2):241-84. PubMed ID: 11661552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New trends in informed consent?
Jaeckel LB
Neb Law Rev; 1975; 54(1):66-92. PubMed ID: 11664487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure.
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 48(3):548-63. PubMed ID: 11664279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The doctrine of informed consent: protecting the patient's right to make informed health care decisions.
Studer MR
Mont Law Rev; 1987; 48(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 11658939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine?
Friedman DA
Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
Shank S
UMKC Law Rev; 1981; 49(3):365-76. PubMed ID: 11658619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent liability.
Recher BC
Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Medical malpractice: expert opinion unnecessary to establish claim based on doctrine of informed consent.
Minn Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 63(4):695-706. PubMed ID: 11665186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent and the material risk standard: a modest proposal.
Morton JE
Pac Law J; 1981 Jul; 12(4):915-36. PubMed ID: 11658351
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
