197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664967)
21. Malpractice: toward a viable disclosure standard for informed consent.
Stansfield MP
Oklahoma Law Rev; 1979; 32(4):868-90. PubMed ID: 11665171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Informed consent: the three tests and a modest proposal for the reality of the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG; Lewis PW
South Tex Law J; 1981; 21(2):155-70. PubMed ID: 11658706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The meaning of informed consent.
Whitfield A
Med Leg J; 1986; 54(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 11653740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed.
Kessenick LW; Mankin PA
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Consent to medical procedures: paternalism, self-determination or therapeutic alliance?
Teff H
Law Q Rev; 1985 Jul; 101():432-53. PubMed ID: 11658726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Informed consent: the law's uneasy compromise with ethical theory.
Weisbard AJ
Neb Law Rev; 1986; 65(4):749-67. PubMed ID: 11658870
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act.
Rosen MW
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. From informed consent to patient choice: a new protected interest.
Shultz MM
Yale Law J; 1985 Dec; 95(2):219-99. PubMed ID: 11658859
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Informed consent to medical treatment.
Robertson G
Law Q Rev; 1981 Jan; 97():102-26. PubMed ID: 11665264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. An economic analysis of informed consent to medical care.
Fajfar M
Georgetown Law J; 1992 Jun; 80(5):1941-71. PubMed ID: 11659918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Informed consent for the terminal patient.
Rutledge TA
Bayl Law Rev; 1975; 27(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 11660876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Case of no consent: the DNR order as a medical decision.
Beatty CD
St Louis Univ Law J; 1987 Sep; 31(3):699-727. PubMed ID: 11658986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Apologetic tort think: autonomy and information torts.
Terry NP
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):189-98. PubMed ID: 11656323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Consent to medical treatment in Canada.
Picard EI
Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Informed consent: Alabama announces a new standard for determining proximate cause.
McFerrin JH
Cumberland Law Rev; 1986-1987; 17(2):519-32. PubMed ID: 11658966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The doctrine of informed consent--fact or fiction?
Markham BB
Forum; 1975; 10(3):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11664458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Patients, agents, and informed consent.
Haber JG
J Law Health; 1985-1986; 1():43-59.. PubMed ID: 11658933
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent: the patient as an individual.
Trichter JG
Forum; 1980; 15(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 11665241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
