These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664967)
41. Informed consent in the prescription drug context: the special case. Tietz GF Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):367-417. PubMed ID: 11652502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Structuring the issues in informed consent. Somerville MA McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):740-808. PubMed ID: 11650591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Informed consent after Cobbs--has the patient been forgotten? Bamberg DF San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 10(4):913-27. PubMed ID: 11661027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Treatment choices and informed consent in psychiatry: implications of the Osheroff case for the profession. Malcolm JG J Psychiatry Law; 1986; 14(1-2):9-106. PubMed ID: 11658874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent. Greenwald AE Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient. Rauzi E Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The decline of "informed consent". Plant ML Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Public psychiatry and the right to refuse treatment: toward an effective damage remedy. Furrow BR Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1984; 19(1):21-60. PubMed ID: 11658667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer? Bromberger B Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness. Kopis WF St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Demanded medical care. Menikoff J Ariz State Law J; 1998; 30(4):1091-126. PubMed ID: 11660771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A structural analysis of the physician-patient relationship in no-code decisionmaking. Hashimoto DM Yale Law J; 1983 Dec; 93(2):362-83. PubMed ID: 11658880 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means? Drigotas EE North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Informed consent: should doctors tell the truth? Riskin LL Boston Univ J; 1975; 23(3):12-20. PubMed ID: 11664687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Informed consent. Riga P Linc Law Rev; 1977; 10(2):159-95. PubMed ID: 11662665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice. Delgado R; Leskovac H UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Informed consent: the illusion of patient choice. Rice N Emory Law J; 1974; 23(2):503-22. PubMed ID: 11664432 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]