BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664970)

  • 1. Right to treatment for the civilly committed: a new Eighth Amendment basis.
    Roberts TD
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1978; 45(3):731-52. PubMed ID: 11664970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a right to treatment for civilly committed mental patients.
    Belzer I
    UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):23-48. PubMed ID: 11664543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Donaldson v. O'Connor: constitutional right to treatment for the involuntary civilly committed.
    Jernigan LT
    North Carol Centr Law J; 1975; 7(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 11664561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Community mental health treatment for the mentally ill -- when does less restrictive treatment become a right?
    Seicshnaydre SE
    Tulane Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 66(6):1971-2001. PubMed ID: 11660060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Civil commitment of mentally ill--right to treatment--parens patriae power--right to liberty.
    Cooper GG
    Akron Law Rev; 1975; 9(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 11664558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relief for the civilly committed: a constitutional right to treatment.
    Stage GL
    KY Law J; 1974-1975; 63(2):469-89. PubMed ID: 11664473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Constitutional law--simple custodial confinement of civilly committed nondangerous mentally ill violates constitutional right to freedom.
    Concemi M
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1975; 10(1):76-99. PubMed ID: 11664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wyatt v. Stickney and the right of civilly committed mental patients to adequate treatment.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 May; 86(7):1282-306. PubMed ID: 11664219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. o'Connor v. Donaldson: a right to liberty for the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Muller MJ
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1975; 3(2):550-62. PubMed ID: 11664550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Constitutional law--due process--involuntarily civilly committed mental patients have a constitutional right to treatment.
    Johnson RM; Wehrle-Einhorn RJ
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1974; 23(1):188-205. PubMed ID: 11664536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Youngberg v. Romeo: the right to treatment dilemma and the mentally retarded.
    Gallo LV
    Albany Law Rev; 1982; 47(1):179-213. PubMed ID: 11658597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Rights and dignity: Congress, the Supreme Court, and people with disabilities after Pennhurst.
    Ferleger D; Scott PM
    West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):327-61. PubMed ID: 11658602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constitutional law--mental health--a patient involuntarily civilly committed to a state mental hospital has a constitutional right to treatment.
    North BS
    Villanova Law Rev; 1974 Nov; 20(1):214-25. PubMed ID: 11664581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Constitutional law--due process--right to treatment for nondangerous involuntarily civilly committed persons.
    Currie EJ
    Miss Law J; 1975; 46(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 11664483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Of mad dogs and scientists: the perils of the "criminal-insane".
    Burt RA
    Univ PA Law Rev; 1974 Dec; 123(2):258-96. PubMed ID: 11664340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mental commitment cases of the 1971-72 Supreme Court term.
    Wing KR; Carman R
    Clgh Rev; 1973 Mar; 6(11):659-62. PubMed ID: 11664360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Constitutional law--individual rights and liberties of the mentally ill--constitutional protection--O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Prousalis TT
    Howard Law J; 1976; 19(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 11662270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.