622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664978)
1. Torts--medical malpractice--Court of Appeals of Maryland adopts doctrine of informed consent.
Penhallegon JR
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1978; 8(1):114-29. PubMed ID: 11664978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical malpractice: the right to be informed.
Kessenick LW; Mankin PA
Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1973; 8(2):261-81. PubMed ID: 11664405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in New York under the Medical Malpractice Insurance Act.
Rosen MW
Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(3):701-27. PubMed ID: 11664598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of North Carolina's treatment of the doctrine of informed consent.
Grubbs WG
Wake Forest Law Rev; 1986; 21(3):757-77. PubMed ID: 11658959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Informed consent in Texas: a proposal for reasonableness and predictability.
Wallach DM; Berry SJ
St Marys Law J; 1987 Nov; 18(3):835-82. PubMed ID: 11658921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent liability.
Recher BC
Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):696-715. PubMed ID: 11664787
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A new standard for informed consent in medical malpractice cases--the role of the expert witness.
Kopis WF
St Louis Univ Law J; 1973; 18(2):256-69. PubMed ID: 11664280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The standard of disclosure by physicians to patients: competing models of informed consent.
Halligan PD
LA Law Rev; 1980; 41(1):9-67. PubMed ID: 11665275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpractice: questions of consent in connection with treatment of genital or urinary organs.
Frantz LB
Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1979; 89():32-77. PubMed ID: 12091927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Informed consent in Washington: expanded scope of material facts that the physician must disclose to his patient.
Rauzi E
Wash Law Rev; 1980 Jun; 55(3):655-75. PubMed ID: 11665260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Physicians and surgeons--malpractice--informed consent of patient: duty to inform patient to be established by expert medical testimony.
Wash Law Rev; 1973 May; 48(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 11664248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical malpractice: informed consent cases in "full-disclosure" jurisdictions.
Seidelson DE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1976; 14(3):309-47. PubMed ID: 11664631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Informed consent in Kentucky after the Medical Malpractice Insurance and Claims Act of 1976.
Curtis JV
KY Law J; 1976; 65():524-40. PubMed ID: 11664783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The expansion of liability for medical accidents: from negligence to strict liability by way of informed consent.
Meisel A
Neb Law Rev; 1977; 56(1):51-152. PubMed ID: 11664804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Tort--informed consent--new directions for medical disclosure--Hopp v. Lepp and Reibl v. Hughes.
Gochnauer M; Fleming DJ
Univ B C Law Rev; 1981; 15(2):475-97. PubMed ID: 11658641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Informed consent.
Horan DJ; Halligan P
Linacre Q; 1982 Nov; 49(4):358-69. PubMed ID: 11649603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The evolution of the doctrine of informed consent.
Georgia Law Rev; 1978; 12(3):581-611. PubMed ID: 11664967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Informed consent: alternatives for Illinois.
Holmstrom JT
Univ Ill Law Forum; 1973; 1973(4):739-56. PubMed ID: 11664278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The doctrine of informed consent--fact or fiction?
Markham BB
Forum; 1975; 10(3):1073-9. PubMed ID: 11664458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The doctrines of lack of consent and lack of informed consent in medical procedures in Louisiana.
Boland GL
LA Law Rev; 1983 Sep; 45(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 11658587
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
