These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
622 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664978)
21. Consent to medical treatment in Canada. Picard EI Osgoode Hall Law J; 1981 Mar; 19(1):140-51. PubMed ID: 11658624 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Canterbury v. Spence--the case and a few comments. Murphy WJ Forum; 1976; 11(3):716-26. PubMed ID: 11664620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical malpractice: informed consent to the locality rule. Karlson HC; Erwin RD Indiana Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 12(4):653-85. PubMed ID: 11665188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas. Cluff CA Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):933-47. PubMed ID: 11655722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Modern status of views as to general measure of physician's duty to inform patient of risks of proposed treatment. Frantz LB Am Law Rep ALR 3rd Cases Annot; 1978; 88():1008-44. PubMed ID: 12091933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The concept of informed consent in the United States, Canada, England and Australia: a comparative analysis. Monks SS Univ Qld Law J; 1993; 17(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11659799 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The doctrine of informed consent. Stewart T Insur Couns J; 1976 Jan; 43(1):118-34. PubMed ID: 11664632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Survey of Washington law: informed consent needed for medical treatment. Gonzaga Law Rev; 1974; 10(1):204-10. PubMed ID: 11664423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Informed consent and malpractice jeopardy: practical aspects. Alsobrook HB Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(3):ORL277-81. PubMed ID: 11664753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Patient participation in medical decision-making: are the courts the answer? Bromberger B Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 11649729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Oh, didn't I tell you? A look at informed consent. Greenwald AE Trial; 1982 Jun; 18(6):54-56, 85. PubMed ID: 11658483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. 'Informed consent' to medical procedures. Skegg PD Med Sci Law; 1975; 15(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 11693128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The decline of "informed consent". Plant ML Wash Lee Law Rev; 1978; 35(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 11665008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent--a proposed standard for medical disclosure. N Y Univ Law Rev; 1973 Jun; 48(3):548-63. PubMed ID: 11664279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Strict liability and informed consent: "Don't say I didn't tell you so! Maldonado JE Akron Law Rev; 1976; 9(4):609-28. PubMed ID: 11664618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Who's afraid of informed consent? An affirmative approach to the medical malpractice crisis. Fierstein RK Brooklyn Law Rev; 1978; 44(2):241-84. PubMed ID: 11661552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Informed consent: looking for the action. Riskin LL Univ Ill Law Forum; 1975; 1975(4):580-611. PubMed ID: 11664566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine? Friedman DA Chic Kent Law Rev; 1981; 57(4):1119-44. PubMed ID: 11658347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Informed consent: a changing standard of disclosure. Eslami M Conn Med; 1984 Jun; 48(6):407. PubMed ID: 11644146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]