These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11664982)
41. Right to abortion limited: the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of parental notification statutes. Byrne TJ Loyola Law Rev; 1982; 28(1):281-96. PubMed ID: 11658437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Gary-Northwest Indiana Women's Services v. Bowen. 25 Jan 1977. U.S. District Court, N.D. Indiana, South Bend Division Fed Suppl; 1977; 421():734-8. PubMed ID: 11646066 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Sexual privacy: access of a minor to contraceptives, abortion, and sterilization without parental consent. Henenberg K Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1977; 12(1):221-44. PubMed ID: 11664910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Poe v. Gerstein. Sanders AD Hofstra Law Rev; 1976; 4(2):531-47. PubMed ID: 11664627 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Paternal interests in the abortion decision: does the father have a say? Diggins M Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():377-97. PubMed ID: 11656041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The right of a husband or a minor's parent to participate in the abortion decision. Judson SH Univ Miami Law Rev; 1973; 28(1):251-6. PubMed ID: 11664356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Abortion, parental burdens, and the right to choose: is a penumbral or Ninth-Amendment right about to arise from the ashes of a common law liberty? Swan GS Case Comment; 1977; 82(3):30-2. PubMed ID: 11664856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The role of minors in health care decision making: current legal issues. Waxse DJ Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(4):17-21. PubMed ID: 11654286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Sex as contract: abortion and expanded choice. Feaver PD; Kling R; Plofchan TK Stanford Law Pol Rev; 1992-1993 Winter; 4():211-20. PubMed ID: 11652652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Beyond roe and doe: the rights of the father. Sherain H Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Feb; 50(3):483-95. PubMed ID: 11663632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Doe v. Doe. 3 Jul 1974. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk North East Rep Second Ser; 1974; 314():128-39. PubMed ID: 12038346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. "Crying stones": a comparison of abortion in Japan and the United States. Wardle LD N Y Law Sch J Int Comp Law; 1993; 14(2-3):183-259. PubMed ID: 11659814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Right to life of the unborn. Garn Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking. Nivala J Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]