These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11665041)

  • 21. If civil commitment is the answer for children, what are the questions?
    Zenoff EH; Zients AB
    George Washington Law Rev; 1983 Jan; 51(2):171-218. PubMed ID: 11658670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Rights within the therapeutic relationship.
    King P
    J Law Health; 1991-1992; 6(1):31-60. PubMed ID: 11659514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. First do no harm: least restrictive alternative analysis and the right of mental patients to refuse treatment.
    Zlotnick D
    West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):375-448. PubMed ID: 11655571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Lessard v. Schmidt: due process and involuntary civil commitment.
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1973; 68(3):585-642. PubMed ID: 11664292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Informed consent to organic behavior control.
    Barnhart BA; Pinkerton ML; Roth RT
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1977; 17(1):39-83. PubMed ID: 11664710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The "right to treatment": can the courts rehabilitate and cure?
    Miller HL
    Public Interest; 1977; (46):. PubMed ID: 11664773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
    Kopolow LE
    Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Children and the idea of liberty: a comment on the civil commitment cases.
    Garvey JH
    KY Law J; 1979-1980; 68(54):809-43. PubMed ID: 11649181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Constitutional law--due process--civil commitment of children by parents--Parham v. J.R.
    Citarella KC
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(4):1001-25. PubMed ID: 11658638
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Substantive due process limits on the duration of civil commitment for the treatment of mental illness.
    Burgett DW
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1981; 16(1):205-64. PubMed ID: 11650560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In the name of treatment: autonomy, civil commitment, and right to refuse treatment.
    Schwartz BM
    Notre Dame Lawyer; 1975 Jun; 50(5):808-42. PubMed ID: 11664466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Constitutional law--confinement of nondangerous mentally ill capable of surviving safely in freedom held to violate patient's right to "liberty".
    Hancock GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):402-9. PubMed ID: 11664793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Compelling treatment in the community: distorted doctrines and violated values.
    Schwartz SJ; Costanzo CE
    Loyola Los Angel Law Rev; 1987 Jun; 20(4):1329-429. PubMed ID: 11658983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Advance directive instruments for those with mental illness.
    Winick BJ
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1996 Oct; 51(1):57-95. PubMed ID: 11660621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment question.
    Univ Colo Law Rev; 1976; 47(2):299-323. PubMed ID: 11664633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Power, uncertainty, and choice: the voluntary commitment of children--Parham v. J.L.
    Simet DP
    Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1982 May; 20(1):141-61. PubMed ID: 11658705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Constitutional law--individual rights and liberties of the mentally ill--constitutional protection--O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Prousalis TT
    Howard Law J; 1976; 19(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 11662270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.